RuleX 3.0 · Redactor and review
From case file to complaint, and the filing arrives reviewed.
You upload twenty documents. Redactor asks the questions a good partner would ask, writes the complaint in a lawyer’s prose, with every fact anchored to its page, and the pre-filing review reads it the way the court will. All in the same place, and in Word.
RuleX’s Redactor works with twenty files at once, asks before drafting when an essential detail is missing and writes long pieces with citations to specific passages; it exports to Word with outline-level headings. The pre-filing review checks your complaint, tutela, appeal, answer or petition against 71 formal and admissibility requirements, calculates the limitation period on the Colombian judicial calendar and sends each correction back to Redactor with one click.
- 01Twenty files, one filing
- 02A review with the judge’s eye
- 03The correction returns to Redactor
Good drafting is reading everything and remembering everything.
The complaint you win with looks little like the one a machine writes from a two-line instruction. It looks like the one written by a lawyer who read the client’s twenty documents, understood which fact matters, knows which claim follows which and never confused page 31 with page 131.
That is what RuleX’s Redactor does today. You hand it the case file (contracts, correspondence, statements, earlier rulings) and it works with all twenty files at once, because each document is read and processed separately: that is why it holds up on long case files without losing detail. What it writes is no summary: it is a long, coherent, reviewable complaint, on the order of twelve pages, in a lawyer’s prose, with connectors and without listicle bullets.
And it writes right beside the case file, in the same place. The filing is not drafted in another tab or another program: it is drafted where your documents, your tasks and your research already are.
Ask, write, cite, deliver.
- 01
It asks before drafting
When an essential detail is missing (the amount in dispute, the date of the breach, who signed), Redactor asks you before writing, on a card with the specific question. It asks for the figure rather than guessing it or leaving a blank, as a colleague would.
- 02
It writes while you watch
From the first second it shows what it is doing (“Planning the search…”, “Writing the facts…”), and the text appears as it is drafted, with the sources cited. The document changes only when the drafting finishes well: it is never left half-done.
- 03
It cites passages, not vague references
Every fact points to the document and the passage it comes from; every legal ground, to the statute or the ruling. The sources open from the filing itself, as everywhere in RuleX. A complete petition under the right of petition, with four cited sources, was measured at about twenty seconds.
- 04
It comes out in real Word
The exported file carries headings with real styles and outline levels, native lists and the “Page X of Y” footer. You open it in Word and keep editing with your template. And on the phone, Redactor takes the full screen, follows the keyboard and organizes the document by sections.
The complaint does not come from a two-line instruction. It comes from twenty documents read one by one.
And now, a reading through the judge’s eyes.
Inadmissibility gives no warning. A claim without a reasoned amount, a missing annex, a conciliation under the wrong statute, and the court sends the filing back. Or worse: the action has expired and nobody noticed.
That is why RuleX brings a pre-filing review. With the filing open, you tap “Review” and the side panel reads it as the court would. Choose the type of filing (complaint, tutela, appeal, answer or right-of-petition request; it is detected automatically) and it returns a verdict: rejection likely, inadmissibility likely, fileable with adjustments or ready to file. With a score from 0 to 100 and a headline that gets to the point: “Your complaint will be found inadmissible because…”.
Seventy-one requirements, each with its article.
71requirements
formal and admissibility: 34 for complaints, 11 for tutela, 7 for appeals, 11 for answers and 8 for petitions.
59rule-checked
are verified with exact rules; the other 12 are targeted questions put to a model that plays the judge.
11numerals
of article 100 of the CGP (Colombia’s General Procedure Code), to find the preliminary exceptions the opposing party would raise.
16deadlines
of limitation, prescription and procedural periods, counted on the Colombian judicial calendar.
A finding is a passage, a rule and a correction.
- 01
Limitation and deadlines
If the period has run, it tells you which day it expired and how many days late the filing arrives. An example from the test bench: a nullity action filed on August 20, 2025 whose cause arose on January 14, 2025; the four-month period expired on May 14 and the filing arrived 98 days late.
- 02
Findings ordered by severity
Each one cites “In your filing”, the exact passage, the rule that requires it and the proposed correction. Those that lead to rejection come before those that lead to inadmissibility, and those before the ones that only weaken the filing.
- 03
The opposing party’s reading
A second pass from the other side: the preliminary exceptions it would raise and the evidence your filing is missing.
- 04
“Apply correction”
Sends Redactor a complete instruction (the rule, the correction, the affected passage and “keep the rest of the text”). The button changes to “Sent to Redactor”. The filing gets corrected in the same place where it was born.
- 05
Rules checked against their text
Conciliation is reviewed under Law 2220 of 2022, annexes under article 84 of the CGP, submission under Law 2213 and the 2026 minimum wage in force.
A breach of contract, from the folder to the court.
A verbal proceeding for breach of a supply contract. The client hands over a folder with twenty documents.
- 9:00 a.m.
You upload the twenty documents
Contract, amendments, purchase orders, emails, invoices, the earlier demand letter. Each file is processed separately and lands in the case file.
- 9:03 a.m.
Redactor asks
Two questions: the amount claimed as lost profits and the date the client sent the last demand. You answer in a minute.
- 9:09 a.m.
The complaint appears
Twelve pages: facts with every page reference, claims, legal grounds, evidence and annexes. The citations open from the text.
- 9:25 a.m.
You tap “Review”
Verdict: fileable with adjustments. Two findings: the conciliation certificate is missing as an annex and the amount is not reasoned in the sworn estimate of damages.
- 9:27 a.m.
“Apply correction”
Redactor rewrites the sworn estimate and flags the missing annex. You review again: ready to file.
- 9:40 a.m.
You export to Word
Headings with outline levels, “Page X of Y” footer. You sign it and file it.
A twelve-page complaint, reviewed against seventy-one requirements, in under an hour of your work.
And if your firm already wrote this kind of filing well…
Firm Memory (one of the releases in this edition) teaches Redactor how your team writes: the form of address, the connectors, the closing formula. And the validity check on what you cite (another release) alerts you if a ruling you cite was later modified. All of it reaches the same filing, in the same Redactor.
What you want to know.
01How many documents can Redactor read to write a complaint?
It works with twenty files at once, processing each document separately to preserve the citations and the context. With them it writes long pieces, on the order of twelve pages, coherent and reviewable.
02Does Redactor ask questions before writing?
Yes. When an essential detail is missing, such as the amount in dispute or a key date, it shows a card with the specific question and waits for your answer before drafting.
03What does the pre-filing review check?
It checks complaints, tutelas, appeals, answers and petitions against 71 formal and admissibility requirements, calculates limitation and deadlines on the Colombian judicial calendar and looks for the preliminary exceptions of article 100 of the CGP that the opposing party would raise.
04How do I apply a correction that the review proposes?
With the “Apply correction” button: it sends Redactor the rule, the correction and the affected passage, and Redactor adjusts the filing while keeping the rest of the text.
05In which formats does it deliver the filing?
In Word, with outline-level headings, native lists and a “Page X of Y” footer. It also exports to PDF, and you can keep editing the text in Redactor’s own Canvas.
06Does it work on the phone?
Yes. Redactor takes the full screen on the phone, follows the keyboard and organizes the document by sections, with actions to expand or rewrite each one.
RuleX 3.0
May the judge read your filing after you have read it.
Upload your next case file to Redactor and let it read all of it. Seven days free, no card.